Break Me Off a Piece...
Okay, so let's talk about Prison Break.
First, I was a smidgen upset about the fact that right when we were finally getting a payoff for spending last season on the run from the baddies, Mike got thrown back in jail. This ever-elusive Company has been following his progress only to throw him into the pit of a portal of hell. No guards, no rules, no law. Great! (sarcasm noted)
...But I came back, because I am trying to have some faith in TPTB who control the show... only to once again have my hopes for a happy ending doused when "they killed Sara and put her head in a box" - in Lincoln's words. I am still in denial about this. I think that I, as well as many others in the viewing audience, were invested in the Sara/Michael story, but now that is nevermore (insert Raven here). I am wondering what there is to invest in now - why should I care if he gets out of jail? Isn't that one of the time-enduring prisoner's dilemmas? From Prison to what?
Curiously enough, this is also the mindset that Lincoln is in. He knows that if he tells Michael about the untimely (read: unfair) demise of Ms. Trancredi he will not continue with his mission, and Linc Jr will be less of a reoccurring character than he already is. This point alone is what might keep me interested in seeing what the outcome will be, and thus, keep me watching - for now. I hope that, like Lost, this show has an endgame in sight. It would suck for the producers to just string the story along without real substance and purpose.
Also, although she is the ultimate enemy, the female baddie that acts as Lincoln's contact is actually kind of interesting. I'm speaking from a place of denial again, but I really hope that she wasn't the one that did the deed on Sara, 'cuz she's fun to watch.
I would really like to suggest to networks the idea of shows with limited season runs. The nature of the industry is changing in response to technology (TiVo, DVR's etc) and competition (cable, movies, internet). I think it would be smart to not drag shows along multiple seasons when they can make a really spectacular story in one or two. Consumers want a beginning, middle, and end - and they will be loyal to networks which deliver in those areas. I for one snip the strings if I feel I am being pulled along aimlessly.
It'll work if you work it ;)
Okay, so let's talk about Prison Break.
First, I was a smidgen upset about the fact that right when we were finally getting a payoff for spending last season on the run from the baddies, Mike got thrown back in jail. This ever-elusive Company has been following his progress only to throw him into the pit of a portal of hell. No guards, no rules, no law. Great! (sarcasm noted)
...But I came back, because I am trying to have some faith in TPTB who control the show... only to once again have my hopes for a happy ending doused when "they killed Sara and put her head in a box" - in Lincoln's words. I am still in denial about this. I think that I, as well as many others in the viewing audience, were invested in the Sara/Michael story, but now that is nevermore (insert Raven here). I am wondering what there is to invest in now - why should I care if he gets out of jail? Isn't that one of the time-enduring prisoner's dilemmas? From Prison to what?
Curiously enough, this is also the mindset that Lincoln is in. He knows that if he tells Michael about the untimely (read: unfair) demise of Ms. Trancredi he will not continue with his mission, and Linc Jr will be less of a reoccurring character than he already is. This point alone is what might keep me interested in seeing what the outcome will be, and thus, keep me watching - for now. I hope that, like Lost, this show has an endgame in sight. It would suck for the producers to just string the story along without real substance and purpose.
Also, although she is the ultimate enemy, the female baddie that acts as Lincoln's contact is actually kind of interesting. I'm speaking from a place of denial again, but I really hope that she wasn't the one that did the deed on Sara, 'cuz she's fun to watch.
I would really like to suggest to networks the idea of shows with limited season runs. The nature of the industry is changing in response to technology (TiVo, DVR's etc) and competition (cable, movies, internet). I think it would be smart to not drag shows along multiple seasons when they can make a really spectacular story in one or two. Consumers want a beginning, middle, and end - and they will be loyal to networks which deliver in those areas. I for one snip the strings if I feel I am being pulled along aimlessly.
It'll work if you work it ;)